Skip to main content

ITSM AI ROI Calculator

An internal service desk drowns in tickets that follow a runbook, like password resets, access requests and software installs. Runbook work is exactly what AI executes well. Put your team's numbers into the calculator below.

The preset opens with 1,500 IT requests a month, 12 minutes of an engineer's time per request at 35 euros an hour, 900 input and 300 output tokens per resolved request and a person checking 15 percent of the model's work, against a 15,000 euro representative build. Every figure recalculates as you edit.

Your numbers

Task
10020,000
€
€800€8,000

With taxes and overhead the hour costs €16.25.

Advanced · minutes per task, build, hosting, tokens
min
190
€
€1,000€30,000
€
€0€1,000
1008,000
503,000
min
130
[01]/right now

Since you opened this page, the task has cost

A person€0.0019 a second
since you opened this page
An hour€6.68
A day€160
A month€4,875
Claude Sonnet 5.5€0.0001 a second
same task, checking included
An hour€0.26
A day€6
A month€190
[02]/a working day

The same day, two ways

At 1,500 requests a month, that is 72 a working day. A person spends 12 minutes on each.

A person, one square is one request1.8 working days every day
9:0013:0017:00
The model, the same 72 requests7 min of compute, 22 min of a person checking
9:0013:0017:00

Each square is one request. The gold sliver is the model writing all 72 answers, about 6 seconds each. The hatched part is the person reading 15 of every 100 before they go out.

[03]/a year

Twelve months, the build paid once

The build pays for itself in 32 days. After that every month keeps €4,685. Twelve months, €51,222.

A personThe modelThe build
€0€2k€4k€6k123456789101112month →build paid off · 32 days
[04]/who still reads the answers

Out of 100 answers, how many does a person read?

Click a square. This is the honest number in the whole calculation, and it costs more than the model does.

15of 100 read by a person
Checking, per request€0.0813
Checking, a year€1,463
Ten more answers add+€975 a year
Hours of reading a year90 h
[05]/which model

Honestly, it barely matters

Seven models at list price, per request with the same checking. Cheapest to dearest, the whole price list fits in €0.0103. The SaaS agent billed per resolution is 9.9× away.

With Claude Sonnet 5.5 the tokens are €0.0053 of the €0.0865 per request. The rest is the person reading. Pick the model for quality, decide the checking for cost.

[06]/how we count

Your inputs and published prices. Nothing else.

Person per request = 12 min / 60 × €16.25 = €3.25
Model per request = (900 × €1.84 + 300 × €9.20) / 1M × 1.2 = €0.0053
Checking per request = 15% × 2 min / 60 × €16.25 = €0.0813
Saving in year one = (1,500 × (€3.25 − €0.0865) − €60) × 12 − €5,000 = €51,222
All formulas, model prices and task defaults

Every formula with your values

Person per request = 12 min / 60 × €16.25 = €3.25
Model per request = (900 × €1.84 + 300 × €9.20) / 1M × 1.2 = €0.0053
Checking per request = 15% × 2 min / 60 × €16.25 = €0.0813
Saving in year one = (1,500 × (€3.25 − €0.0865) − €60) × 12 − €5,000 = €51,222
Payback = €5,000 / €4,685 a month = 32 days
Break-even volume = (€5,000 / 12 + €60) / (€3.25 − €0.0865) = 151 a month

Published list prices, USD per million tokens

Prices as of 2026-10-21. Copied from the vendors' pricing pages on that date. Check the linked page before you sign anything.

ModelInputOutputSource
Claude Haiku 5.5Anthropic$0.1$0.5Pricing page ↗
Claude Sonnet 5.5Anthropic$2$10Pricing page ↗
Claude Opus 5.5Anthropic$4$20Pricing page ↗
Gemini 3.8 FlashGoogle$0.75$3.75Pricing page ↗
Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle$2$12Pricing page ↗
GPT-6 LunaOpenAI$0.1$0.5Pricing page ↗
GPT-6 SolOpenAI$2$10Pricing page ↗
Intercom Fin (per resolution)SaaS, per resolution$0.99 / taskPricing page ↗

What each task assumes

TaskMinutesTokens in / outCheckedBuildSaving a year
Support ticket reply81,200 / 40020% × 3 min€4,500€90,641
IT request (reset, access)12900 / 30015% × 2 min€5,000€51,222
Lead research and qualification152,500 / 60030% × 4 min€3,500€31,543
Sales email or proposal draft403,000 / 1,200100% × 8 min€3,000€27,408
Invoice parsing and entry62,000 / 50025% × 2 min€6,000€46,547
Email classification and routing2600 / 1005% × 1 min€2,500€47,247
RFP / security questionnaire answer254,000 / 80060% × 6 min€5,000€8,148
Payment reminder and collections touch61,500 / 30030% × 2 min€4,000€21,486
Your own task101,500 / 50030% × 3 min€4,000€24,749

Working estimates from projects delivered in 2025 and 2026, not benchmarks. Every number is editable above. The saving uses your salary, currency and model.

Email me this estimate

One email with the figures and the link to this exact calculation. No newsletter.

By submitting, you agree we process your details to reply to you.

What AI actually automates in ITSM

The high-volume, low-judgment tickets are the target. A first ITSM automation typically covers:

  • 01Password resets and account unlocks, verified and executed end to end without an engineer.
  • 02Access and permission requests routed through approval and provisioned automatically once approved.
  • 03Ticket categorization, priority and assignment, so nothing sits in the intake queue overnight.
  • 04Answers from your internal docs on VPN setup, device policies and the how-to questions that make up a third of many queues.
  • 05Incident summaries and status updates that engineers currently write by hand during and after outages.

Realistic ranges to expect

Published benchmark data puts AI-driven deflection of service desk tickets in the 50 to 70 percent range for the routine categories, The calculator does not apply that rate; it compares the cost of one request done by an engineer with the cost of the same request done by the model plus the checks a person still makes. If your documentation is patchy or your stack is heavily customized, set the review share to 30 or 40 percent and use that as the planning number.

Because IT hours cost more than front-line support, each request the model resolves is worth more, so the same review share pays back faster here than in most departments.

What the research says

Dated, sourced numbers from the two largest ITSM benchmark datasets published recently:

Freshworks' 2025 Freshservice benchmark, built on more than 187 million tickets from 10,551 organizations, found IT teams using its AI copilot saw a 76.6 percent decrease in ticket resolution time, and its AI agent reached a 65.7 percent ticket deflection rate.

Freshworks Freshservice Benchmark Report, 12 August 2025 ↗

In April 2026 ServiceNow published Robinhood's numbers. AI deflects 70 percent of employee requests across IT, HR and Legal before a human needs to step in, saving about 2,200 hours of manual effort across 1,300 tickets a month.

ServiceNow press release, 9 April 2026 ↗

How to read your result

Both benchmark numbers above come from vendors selling the tools, so treat them as the optimistic edge of the range. Our calculator deliberately prices the human review instead of quoting a deflection rate. The honest ITSM story is still strong. The ticket categories are well-defined, the fix procedures are documented and success is trivially measurable in your existing ITSM tool, which makes this one of the safest first AI projects an operations team can run.

ITSM ROI questions

01Does this require replacing our ITSM platform?

No. We build on top of what you run, Jira Service Management, Freshservice, ServiceNow or a shared inbox, through their APIs. The automation reads and writes tickets in the tool your team already uses.

02What about security and access control?

Actions that grant access always go through your existing approval chain; the AI prepares and executes, it does not approve. For regulated environments we deploy on-premise so no ticket data leaves your network.

03Which tickets should we automate first?

Sort last quarter's tickets by category volume and pick the top two runbook categories, usually resets and access. That slice alone often covers the whole build cost within months.

04How do we measure success after launch?

Three numbers from your ITSM tool: deflection rate on the automated categories, median resolution time and reopen rate. We set the baseline before launch so the delta is unarguable.